Receptive Capital Blog

Opinions and updates on the East Coast cannabis markets.

Opinions Rick Bashkoff Opinions Rick Bashkoff

A Multi-Dimensional Regional Cannabis Market Landscape on the East Coast

We envision a multi-dimensional regional market landscape on the east coast within the next 5 years. These regional and hyper-regional markets will be driven by consumer demands for products that fit their way of life and deliver the value they seek.

Cannabis is personal. Each person experiences cannabis differently just as we experience our lives differently. Cannabis communities form as consumers seek those who have similar or desirable experiences with the plant.

For that reason, we envision a multi-dimensional regional market landscape on the east coast within the next 5 years. These regional and hyper-regional markets will be driven by consumer demands for products that fit their way of life and deliver the value they seek. Brands who are able to align their value they deliver with consumers’ desires at this regional level will establish a foothold in their respective region.

Here are some examples:
- Top Level Regions: NORTHEAST / SOUTHEAST
- Sub Regions: NEW ENGLAND, MID ATLANTIC, CAROLINAS, GEORGIA and FLORIDA
- DMAs: NYC, PHILLY, BOSTON, DC, ATLANTA, MIAMI

Which brands currently have a head start in these regions, sub-regions and DMAs?

Read More
East Coast Industry Updates Rick Bashkoff East Coast Industry Updates Rick Bashkoff

Incremental Change in Insurance Reimbursement for Medical Cannabis

Insurance reimbursement for medical cannabis is one area where we are seeing this incremental change.

We in the cannabis industry are used to small, incremental steps towards normalization. We believe it’s these small steps that eventually compound and result in lasting changes in mindset. Insurance reimbursement for medical cannabis is one area where we are seeing this incremental change.

While adult use gets the headlines, the medical use case almost always comes first and builds the pathway for adult use. Once a market graduates to adult use, medical use usually drops off as medical patients no longer bother with certifying, seeing a doctor for recommendations and other key elements to a successful medical cannabis program. Why? Because they don’t see the benefit. They can go to an adult use dispensary, get a recommendation from a budtender and buy the same medicine. So even if I am medical patient, why bother? I would argue that adhering to the medical program and working with a physician is a good reason. But fair point, that’s a little weak for the everyday medical user. When a market legalizes adult use, we’ve seen a few ways that medical patients can and should receive priority in order to receive uninterrupted, frictionless access. Such as medical patient only store hours or priority access to specific pain focused products. But what if your medical cannabis was treated like other medicines and all of a sudden you could possibly get reimbursed for that medicine?

Many states are not waiting on federal action and are passing state-level statutes that require or enable insurance carriers to reimburse patients for medical cannabis expenses. Now before everyone with a medical card and “chronic pain” gets excited, most of these state level bills come with caveats to make sure the casual adult use weed smoker is not being reimbursed for medicine. For example, here on the east coast:

  1. New York lawmakers approved a bill that would require public health insurance providers in the state to include medical marijuana as a covered prescription drug and authorize private insurers to do the same (so no guarantee for private insurers).

  2. A Pennsylvania appeals court ruled that the state’s medical marijuana law does not prohibit insurers from reimbursing injured workers for medical marijuana in cases where the drug is used to treat accepted work injuries.

As we’ve seen medical cannabis can be a viable option for patients with various conditions, we believe as the New York bill states, “Access to medical marijuana should not be limited to those who can pay out of pocket.”

Read More